46 lines
2.7 KiB
HTML
46 lines
2.7 KiB
HTML
|
<p>In the past I've mentioned both ARM and even the ARM-based laptop
|
||
|
|
currently in development, the MNT Reform. Since they do not use any kind
|
||
|
|
of microcode for system instructions, it is a very appealing alternative
|
||
|
|
to x86 architectures (be it Intel or AMD). No more malware running in
|
||
|
|
the background possibly reading your memory and sending it off to
|
||
|
|
Intel/AMD headquarters. What's more, these boards tend to be cheaper and
|
||
|
|
consume less energy than x86.</p>
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
<p>Even so, something that is problematic about ARM is that many of the
|
||
|
|
boards are for more <i>restrictive devices</i>. What I mean by this is
|
||
|
|
that generally the smaller the device, the more restrictive it is. We
|
||
|
|
start with workstations where you can easily replace practically any
|
||
|
|
piece of it with another; from something as general as the GPU to
|
||
|
|
something as essential as the CPU itself. But as the device gets
|
||
|
|
smaller, it becomes less modular. It then becomes impossible to replace
|
||
|
|
certain parts. In the case of ARM boards this is a very common problem,
|
||
|
|
as generally they are made for embedded devices, mobile phones, and more
|
||
|
|
recently netbooks and servers. As such, it is common with these boards
|
||
|
|
for the components to be directly attached and impossible to
|
||
|
|
replace. Although, luckily ARM seems to be catching up in this regard as
|
||
|
|
companies start considering using ARM for different use-cases, such as
|
||
|
|
personal computers, servers, and even super-computers.</p>
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
<p>None of this, however, detracts from the fact that some of the most
|
||
|
|
free options we have today are ARM-based, when it comes to software
|
||
|
|
freedom. And it may even begin to make complete software freedom more
|
||
|
|
accessible to folk since these options can be cheap, and yet powerful. A
|
||
|
|
good example of this would be the computer from which I am currently
|
||
|
|
writing this post, an ASUS C201P. It's a really cheap chromebook with
|
||
|
|
4 GiB of RAM and a four core CPU. It uses a rockchip board underneath,
|
||
|
|
and one can <a href="https://libreboot.org/docs/install/c201.html"
|
||
|
|
target="_blank" >easily flash libreboot on it</a>. It's even possible to
|
||
|
|
make use of graphics acceleration without non-free Mali drivers by using
|
||
|
|
Panfrost - which comes included in the latest kernel versions, since 5.2
|
||
|
|
I believe. The only components you won't be able to use because of their
|
||
|
|
non-free firmware/drivers would be the webcam and the WiFi card.</p>
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
<p>Overall, it would seem that ARM continues to make complete user
|
||
|
|
control over their software more and more accessible. And as their
|
||
|
|
production diversifies we will likely see boards that allow us to
|
||
|
|
customize more components, such as the <a
|
||
|
|
href="http://macchiatobin.net/" target="_blank" >Marvell
|
||
|
|
MACCHIATObin</a>. It will be exciting to see what ARM has in store for
|
||
|
|
us and the free software movement.</p>
|
||
|
|
|