70 lines
4.5 KiB
HTML
70 lines
4.5 KiB
HTML
|
<p>I am very much a GPL advocate, and the more I get into programming the more
|
||
|
I favour the GPL licenses. I have many reasons for this, some of them
|
||
|
applying to myself personally, but others that are applicable at a larger
|
||
|
scale as to how it benefits software creation in general. However, I
|
||
|
will start out with how I came to use Free Software and why I ended up
|
||
|
with the mentality towards software licenses I have today.</p>
|
||
|
|
||
|
<p>For 15 years all I really used were Mac computers, which are Unix based
|
||
|
systems but still proprietary. It's not practical to imagine I would know
|
||
|
or care about something like licensing or ethics during this time, I don't
|
||
|
believe I arrived at the age of reason until I was around 15, and although
|
||
|
some of my personality and beliefs have changed since then, my thoughts
|
||
|
have not strayed much from what they were at that age. When I was 15 I got
|
||
|
my first personal laptop that I could use for my own purposes. It was an
|
||
|
old laptop that my dad used to use for work, but for work he always used
|
||
|
GNU/Linux, and the laptop did not have Windows, and even if it did it was
|
||
|
an old 32-bit computer with 1GB of RAM (I ended up adding another GigaByte
|
||
|
to that). Even if I wanted to use Windows on there I couldn't because it
|
||
|
wouldn't run as quickly as GNU/Linux. So this was the first time I ran
|
||
|
GNU/Linux as a main OS. At this point I didn't care too much about Free
|
||
|
Software, but I was well on my way to being a Free Software advocate, as my
|
||
|
political ideology had moved very much left-ward where Free Software can
|
||
|
almost be considered the licenses of the left-wing.</p>
|
||
|
|
||
|
<p>After a few years of running GNU/Linux I started to get rid of all the
|
||
|
Apple products I had (because Apple makes it hard as hell to use their shit
|
||
|
with anything else that isn't their shit, mostly being the damn iPod I had
|
||
|
which didn't like syncing with my GNU/Linux machine until I found a
|
||
|
half-assed hack that got me to fix that shit). At one point I came to the
|
||
|
conclusion that the reason why Apple products (along with others) did not
|
||
|
play well with others is because they are non-free and do not allow people
|
||
|
to create programs that work with their shit (because that means you're
|
||
|
using someone else's stuff instead of their shit). After this pissed me off
|
||
|
I personally decided to stop using non-free software as much as I could to
|
||
|
the point where now the only non-free software on my computer are some
|
||
|
wireless drivers that I need for my laptop.</p>
|
||
|
|
||
|
<p>While I used GNU/Linux I also started to get into programming, which is
|
||
|
where I was exposed to software licenses. Since I was on an old shitty
|
||
|
computer I couldn't really do much gaming, but I could do a lot of
|
||
|
programming, so I ended up programming small games that I could play.
|
||
|
But when the time came to choose a license I decided on the GPL, reason
|
||
|
being (at the time) that I want people to be able to learn from my code,
|
||
|
but I don't want people to take advantage of me by grabbing whatever code I
|
||
|
create and making it proprietary and then improving upon it, as that would
|
||
|
essentially be stealing my foundations and building on top of it without
|
||
|
giving back. So I sided with the GPL licenses.</p>
|
||
|
|
||
|
<p>However, those are only personal reasons that I had at the time, there are
|
||
|
more reasons that do not affect me personally but are important at a larger
|
||
|
scale. This being that GPL promotes people to contribute and promotes
|
||
|
collective improvement to a project instead of everyone making their own
|
||
|
version of the wheel. If I create code that is useful and then share it
|
||
|
someone else can use that code to make something that's even better and
|
||
|
then someone else upon that continuously improving the software. Meanwhile,
|
||
|
with other licenses such as MIT or BSD people can simply take your code and
|
||
|
make whatever improvements they make proprietary forcing everyone else to
|
||
|
have to reinvent that wheel. Of course, attribution license defendants will
|
||
|
say that many times these entities do return code to its original source,
|
||
|
and although that is true, I would rather not rely on the good will of a
|
||
|
few nice people, but rather force everyone to share what they have in order
|
||
|
to assure that progress can be fluid and continuous.</p>
|
||
|
|
||
|
<p>I believe that the GPL licenses create a more educational environment and
|
||
|
that they allow for more progress following the scientific philosophy of
|
||
|
building upon the shoulders of giants. With that mentality I believe we can
|
||
|
get much further than what could be created with each of us going our own
|
||
|
separate ways without having any knowledge of what the other has done.</p>
|
||
|
|