82 lines
5.2 KiB
HTML
82 lines
5.2 KiB
HTML
|
<p>Some time ago, I was talking with a friend, and he brought up how a mutual
|
||
|
friend of ours had suggested that it is possible that Moses, the Biblical
|
||
|
character from the Old Testament, did not historically exist. Rather, that he
|
||
|
is simply a literary character used to explain Israel's liberation from Egypt
|
||
|
and settlement in the Holy Land. My friend asked me this to get my opinion on
|
||
|
whether or not this is doctrinally acceptable. My answer, however, is not as
|
||
|
simple as a "yes" or "no". Perhaps it is not, I have not investigated to see if
|
||
|
the Church has any magisterial teaching on this matter, but I would like to take
|
||
|
this opportunity to comment on interpreting Scripture in general as a historical
|
||
|
text.</p>
|
||
|
|
||
|
<p>To begin, I'd like to say that I greatly respect this mutual friend of ours,
|
||
|
and I know that either he was joking when he said it, or he has good reason to
|
||
|
believe it's a possibility. This mutual friend was a seminarian, and has studied
|
||
|
a Master's degree in history. He is also a person I know to uphold doctrinal
|
||
|
orthodoxy, even if it is unpopular. So whether or not I agree with his opinion,
|
||
|
I believe it is respectable simply from his credentials and merits. However,
|
||
|
since I do not have much knowledge regarding this topic, I will instead focus on
|
||
|
another topic where I am knowledgeable of the magisterial teaching and current
|
||
|
scientific theories regarding the matter: Creationism versus Evolution.</p>
|
||
|
|
||
|
<p>Whenever we bring up a question regarding Faith or Morals, our first step
|
||
|
must always be to pick up a Catechism, or in general see what the Magisterium of
|
||
|
the Catholic Church has to say on the matter. Not just to find a definitive
|
||
|
statement, but especially to find the reasoning. If the Church has an official
|
||
|
teaching on such a matter of Faith or Morals, we must either subject our
|
||
|
opinions to that teaching, or reject the teaching and Christ's Church (i.e.
|
||
|
reject Catholicism). It's not necessary to know why things are the way they are,
|
||
|
only God knows that for sure. But we must be humble like children before the
|
||
|
infinite wisdom and knowledge of God. If, on the other hand, the Church does not
|
||
|
have any definitive teaching on the topic, then we are free to take a variety of
|
||
|
opinions so long as they are compatible with the rest of Catholic Doctrine.</p>
|
||
|
|
||
|
<p>To explain this with our example, the Church has <em>no definitive teaching</em>
|
||
|
on the question of Creationism or Evolution; and in fact, She shall <em>never</em>
|
||
|
have such a teaching, as this is a question of science and not Faith or Morals.
|
||
|
As such it lies strictly outside the jurisdiction of the Church's teaching
|
||
|
authority. You can easily discern this by contemplating whether believing in one
|
||
|
or the other contradicts any doctrine for our salvation, which neither Evolution
|
||
|
nor Creationism does.<sup><a href="#n1" >(1)</a></sup> As such, it is not
|
||
|
problematic for a Christian to believe either of these theories. God will not
|
||
|
judge either of these people based on their beliefs on how species came to be as
|
||
|
they are.</p>
|
||
|
|
||
|
<p>So the question now stands, if the Church has no official teaching, and
|
||
|
therefore which you choose to believe has no direct effect on your salvation,
|
||
|
which should you believe? Should you believe the interpretation of Scripture
|
||
|
that is more true to the literal meaning, or the interpretation that has been
|
||
|
harmonized with modern scientific discoveries? My view on the matter may be
|
||
|
controversial, but I believe you should believe whatever helps you to grow in
|
||
|
faith and charity. If it helps your faith to believe in Theistic Evolution, then
|
||
|
do so. If you find it difficult to harmonize Evolution with Biblical inerrancy
|
||
|
then go ahead and believe in Creationism. But most importantly: be respectful of
|
||
|
those who disagree with you, and recognize that this one belief of yours in
|
||
|
<em>personal</em>. Do not convince others that this is the only thing that a
|
||
|
good Christian can believe. And to carry my point home: don't use your personal
|
||
|
belief as an excuse to hinder scientific discovery on the matter. If you are
|
||
|
truly convinced of your opinion, let the truth find its way out, as it
|
||
|
eventually will. But do not be afraid of scientific discovery, for truth cannot
|
||
|
contradict Truth.</p>
|
||
|
|
||
|
<p>Finally, since I'm bound to get some commentary on the matter, I will
|
||
|
publicly state that I accept Theistic Evolution. I think that this theory helps
|
||
|
to explain certain accounts in Genesis, such as where Cain's wife comes from;
|
||
|
but as a lay person, I don't wish to be so naïve as to proselytize others with
|
||
|
my belief. Only God knows the ultimate truth behind these sorts of things, and
|
||
|
on the final day when the truth is revealed to us, we should be humble in
|
||
|
accepting whatever may be the case. So again, believe what you want, but accept
|
||
|
that the Church has no official standing on these matters, that scientific
|
||
|
theories are imperfect and subject to change, that you may be wrong, and above
|
||
|
all that it's ultimately not that big of a deal.</p>
|
||
|
|
||
|
<h3>Notes</h3>
|
||
|
<ol class="notes" >
|
||
|
<li id="n1" >
|
||
|
When speaking of "Evolution" I'm specifically referring to Theistic
|
||
|
Evolution. As a random and meaningless evolution that is not directed by
|
||
|
God for the creation of Man in His image & likeness is directly in
|
||
|
contradiction with Judaeo-Christian theology.
|
||
|
</li>
|
||
|
</ol>
|