70 lines
4.1 KiB
HTML
70 lines
4.1 KiB
HTML
|
<p>Despite being a computer engineer (student), I am actually quite
|
||
|
|
skeptical of technology and new technological innovations, especially
|
||
|
|
the more complex and interdependent they become. My exposure to
|
||
|
|
Primitivist literature has also contributed significantly to this
|
||
|
|
skepticism, although I always try to be as pragmatic as possible. I say
|
||
|
|
this so that the reader may know my personal biases on this matter prior
|
||
|
|
to exposing the topic at hand.</p>
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
<p>A certain tendency that I believe is very frequent in the
|
||
|
|
technologically developed world today is one of absolute reliance on
|
||
|
|
complex technologies, and believing that any solution may have a
|
||
|
|
technological - or what people will often (erroneously) call
|
||
|
|
"scientific" - solution. That is to say, the belief that any problem can
|
||
|
|
be solved with a new technological innovation, and any problems we
|
||
|
|
currently face only exist because we have not yet (but will) find a
|
||
|
|
technological solution for them.</p>
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
<p>It is first worth noting that this is a kind of faith. You can say
|
||
|
|
it's a faith in technology, "science", or simply human ingenuity, but
|
||
|
|
ultimately it is faith. The question to ask is whether this faith is
|
||
|
|
well-founded. Should we have faith in technology as a means of our
|
||
|
|
salvation? It may sound silly when phrased that way, but this is
|
||
|
|
ultimately the question. Just that instead of the spiritual salvation
|
||
|
|
we're speaking of a temporal salvation.</p>
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
<p>I cannot help but to conclude that this faith is wrongly founded,
|
||
|
|
since it is faith in something that is ultimately as limited as we are,
|
||
|
|
and therefore limited by the laws of the universe. If to solve a given
|
||
|
|
problem simply with a new technology would require breaking the laws of
|
||
|
|
the universe, then said solution simply isn't going to be possible,
|
||
|
|
since we are unable to break these laws no matter how hard we may try.
|
||
|
|
It's also worth noting that technology has a history of not solving the
|
||
|
|
world's problems, or what's worse, making new ones. We simply have to
|
||
|
|
consider problems that have always existed, such as poverty, hunger,
|
||
|
|
war, violence, etc. These have always existed, and they always will.
|
||
|
|
Technology hasn't saved us nor will it.</p>
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
<p>However, especially for the religiously inclined, I believe this is a
|
||
|
|
dangerous kind of faith, as faith in technology ends up turning into an
|
||
|
|
idolatry of technology, turning it into a new god. Rather than having
|
||
|
|
faith in God's Divine Will, and changing ourselves to live in accordance
|
||
|
|
to His Will, we believe that we by means of our own creations may save
|
||
|
|
ourselves and as such construct a kind of heaven on Earth. This, as any
|
||
|
|
good Christian will know, falls into three kinds of errors: Pelagianism,
|
||
|
|
Millenarianism, and idolatry. I've already explained how this becomes
|
||
|
|
idolatry. It is Pelagian because it expresses an ability for Man to save
|
||
|
|
himself through his own merits, in this case his own human ingenuity,
|
||
|
|
therefore believing we do not need God. This is no less than the sin of
|
||
|
|
the devil, and the temptation which he presented to Adam and Eve. It is
|
||
|
|
also Millenarianism, as it aims towards the creation of a terrestrial
|
||
|
|
paradise, for utopia to be created here on Earth rather than God Himself
|
||
|
|
bringing us into the beatific vision, which we do not deserve but
|
||
|
|
receive by His Grace and Love alone.</p>
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
<p>Finally, there is a real possibility of falling into an additional
|
||
|
|
error, which is that of Gnosticism. This is particularly present in the
|
||
|
|
ideas of Transhumanism. The idea of transcending our human bodies so as
|
||
|
|
to surpass its limitations and, once again, <em>be like gods</em>. This
|
||
|
|
is, by its very essence, an <em>anti-human</em> mentality, as it rejects
|
||
|
|
something that is innate to human beings: our bodies. We are not spirits
|
||
|
|
trapped in a body, we <em>are</em> our body and the spirit which
|
||
|
|
animates it. To separate these is to say that one's foot and one's hand
|
||
|
|
are not one's body. Both form part of one's body, just as both body and
|
||
|
|
soul form part of oneself.</p>
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
<p>Ultimately, I believe this post is more of a rant than anything else,
|
||
|
|
but I do hope that it gives you, the reader, something to think about
|
||
|
|
with regards to your relationship with technology in your life, and your
|
||
|
|
attitude towards technology.</p>
|