nortega/themusicinnoise-site
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 1 Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Blog: AI post: Complete section on analogy

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Nicolás A. Ortega Froysa 2025-04-08 12:57:18 +02:00
parent 7489719607
commit 26d5aef4f1
1 changed files with 31 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

32
src/blog/draft_ai-is-in-the-cave.html.php
View File

@ -110,7 +110,37 @@ single rational agent trying to induce a meaning into a text that wasn't
infused with meaning to begin with. infused with meaning to begin with.
</p> </p>
<h2>Here be Demons</h2> <p>
It is from this understanding that some of the various flaws of LLMs begin to
make sense. For example, the reason why they cannot accurately cite sources is
because, firstly, they do not know what a source even is, but secondly, because
it is simply looking back into its data and checking what usually follows
within that context with the parameters of “citing the source,” which is why it
so often simply makes them up. The truth is that its source is <em>all</em> its
data mashed together probabilistically based on the input prompt and the
context of the overall “conversation.”
</p>
<p>
Getting back, however, to a question raised earlier about the level of
consciousness of these LLMs, although in the analogy given above the man surely
has a rational soul and a human intellect, it is also evident how it is not
necessary to make use of these higher faculties in order to do what these
machines can do: it is merely pattern recognition and probabilistic
computation. This is something that even the beasts could do if sufficiently
trained (think of the example of a parrot). The machine has no concept of the
<em>meaning</em> symbolized by these words; in fact, it does not see them as
symbols at all, but tokens with numerical values. And if it cannot comprehend
meaning, then it certainly cannot reason on the basis of meaning. What is more,
this is not simply a question of needing more training or more data, it is a
matter of the process itself; for no matter how much you train the man in the
analogy with more data and better pattern recognition techniques, he never will
have actually learned Chinese until he starts to associate meaning those
symbols and is thus able to reason a response instead of merely guessing what
tokens go next.
</p>
<h2>Here Be Demons</h2>
<h2>Hammers Are for Nails</h2> <h2>Hammers Are for Nails</h2>